user icon

Retaining current F1 manufacturers priority for 2021 - Todt

  • Published on 08 Sep 2018 14:17
  • comments 10
  • By: Harry Mattocks

In 2021, Formula 1 is set to drastically change the regulations of the sport, with cheaper, simpler and louder engines being the target. This was originally planned in order to entice new teams and manufacturers into the sport, with several parties interested when the proposal was made.

These interested parties included big names such as Aston Martin and Porsche, but neither has signalled their intention to join, as the proposal is much less transformative than what was originally suggested.

Former Ferrari CEO, and now president of the FIA, Jean Todt believes that that Formula One would be sending the wrong message if they brought in new regulations simply in order to entice new entries. Instead, he believes that the priority for the new regulations should be to ensure that the current manufacturers sign up for the next cycle of regulations.

“Me personally, I was always pessimistic to the fact that with specific rules for Formula 1, we could have more than four manufacturers," said Toft. "Personally, I feel it’s really a great achievement to have four different powertrains for 10 teams, because it means 2.5 [engine suppliers] per team."

“I would say my priority is to make sure that we keep those four. I always said it would be very unfair to the four engaged to say ‘OK, we want to attract a new one, so let’s change everything’. So what about them? About all the investments they’ve been doing for years, and change completely the regulations because we may have one or two coming?"

“So that was one of the reasons why it was not a revolution on the engine regulations. Now if we can secure those four, for me, that would be a great achievement."

Isnt this a repost? Oh well, again, translating from FIAish: we failed to convince anyone else of joining up, and now we are scared of losing the ones we've got to boot, so just be happy for what you get. Four is a good number anyway. I like four. Dont you like four? Yes, four is a good number. F... [Read more]

  • 1
  • Sep 8 2018 - 15:51

Replies (10)

Login to reply
  • Isnt this a repost? Oh well, again, translating from FIAish: we failed to convince anyone else of joining up, and now we are scared of losing the ones we've got to boot, so just be happy for what you get. Four is a good number anyway. I like four. Dont you like four? Yes, four is a good number. Four.

    • + 1
    • Sep 8 2018 - 15:51
  • f1dave

    Posts: 782

    Just another way of saying business as usual, big teams make the rules the FIA follows along like a little puppy dog.

    • + 0
    • Sep 8 2018 - 16:27
  • Freguz

    Posts: 160

    As usual, talking too much. Empty barrels makes the most noise...

    • + 0
    • Sep 8 2018 - 16:34
  • kngrthr

    Posts: 203

    dodgy maths too

    • + 0
    • Sep 9 2018 - 01:09
  • sucks to know that, talks with Porsche/Audi failed.

    • + 0
    • Sep 9 2018 - 18:05
    • VW, one Japanese brand (I suspect Nissan, as Toyota has demented any interest in F1 for a while now) and at least one other interested AFAIK. And yet they still managed to flop it. Its kinda amazing, isnt it?

      • + 0
      • Sep 9 2018 - 19:16
    • Bhurt

      Posts: 320

      The most surprising thing to me is that anyone thought the existing manufacturers would agree to just let others in. Had someone else entered, who exactly would buy their engines with the way Ferrari has locked up both Haas and Sauber and so on.

      This was a non-story from start to finish.

      • + 0
      • Sep 9 2018 - 22:25
    • Existing manufacturers probably would welcome the new ones with open arms, as who doesn't like to see the name brand competitor to make a fool of oneself while figuring ourt these complex engines?

      • + 0
      • Sep 10 2018 - 03:12
    • People who dont like competition all that much?

      • + 0
      • Sep 10 2018 - 05:49
    • Bhurt

      Posts: 320

      @MCBHARGAV - new manufacturers coming in would have meant a whole new engine format which would have meant two things: new costs for development and having to scrap parts they had already spent a fortune developing.

      • + 0
      • Sep 10 2018 - 18:20

BE Grand Prix of Belgium

Local time 

BE Grand Prix of Belgium

Local time 

Related news

World Championship standings 2022

Show full world champion standings

Test calendar

See full test schedule

Give your opinion!

Will Bottas challenge Hamilton for the world championship in 2020?

Team profile

Show full profile

Formula 1 Calendar - 2022

Date
Grand Prix
Circuit
-
Spain
-
Bahrain
18 - Mar 20
Bahrain
25 - Mar 27
Saudi Arabia
8 - Apr 10
Australia
22 - Apr 24
Italy
6 - May 8
United States of America
20 - May 22
Spain
27 - May 29
Monaco
10 - Jun 12
Azerbaijan
17 - Jun 19
Canada
1 - Jul 3
United Kingdom
8 - Jul 10
Austria
22 - Jul 24
France
29 - Jul 31
Hungary
26 - Aug 28
Belgium
2 - Sep 4
Netherlands
9 - Sep 11
Italy
30 - Oct 2
Singapore
7 - Oct 9
Japan
21 - Oct 23
United States of America
28 - Oct 30
Mexico
11 - Nov 13
Brazil
18 - Nov 20
United Arab Emirates
See full schedule

Formula 1 Calendar - 2022

Date
Grand Prix & Circuit
18 - Mar 20
25 - Mar 27
Saudi Arabia Jeddah Street Circuit
8 - Apr 10
Australia Albert Park
22 - Apr 24
6 - May 8
United States of America Miami International Autodrome
20 - May 22
27 - May 29
Monaco Monte Carlo
10 - Jun 12
Azerbaijan Baku City Circuit
17 - Jun 19
1 - Jul 3
United Kingdom Silverstone
8 - Jul 10
Austria Red Bull Ring
22 - Jul 24
France Paul Ricard
29 - Jul 31
Hungary Hungaroring
26 - Aug 28
2 - Sep 4
Netherlands Circuit Zandvoort
9 - Sep 11
Italy Monza
30 - Oct 2
7 - Oct 9
21 - Oct 23
United States of America Circuit of the Americas
28 - Oct 30
11 - Nov 13
Brazil Interlagos
18 - Nov 20
United Arab Emirates Yas Marina Circuit
See full schedule
show sidebar