user icon

Hakkinen keert als ambassadeur terug bij McLaren

  • Gepubliceerd op 16 maa 2017 14:44
  • comments 37
  • Door: Rob Veenstra

McLaren heeft een oude bekende aan zich gebonden. Tweevoudig wereldkampioen Mika Hakkinen gaat zich als ambassadeur inzetten voor de Britse renstal en het merk. De Fin is een meerjarig contract met McLaren overeengekomen. Hakkinen verscheen tussen 1993 en 2001 130 maal namens het in Woking gevestigde team aan de start van een Grand Prix.

In 1998 en 1999 veroverde hij de wereldtitel voor McLaren. Hakkinen: "Ik heb McLaren altijd als mijn thuis in de Formule 1 beschouwd en het team heeft een speciaal plekje in mijn hart. De afgelopen jaren zijn niet makkelijk geweest voor McLaren, maar voor mij staat het vast dat het een kwestie van tijd is voordat het team zich weer vooraan zal melden. Ik wil daar mijn bijdrage aan leveren. Het was een makkelijke beslissing om terug te keren. Het contact met McLaren is nooit verwaterd."

"Ik kijk ernaar uit om samen te werken met McLaren-directeur Zak Brown, die een McLaren uit 2001 bezit. We hebben gesproken over hoe we elkaar kunnen helpen en ik zie dat hij de fundering aan het leggen is om McLaren terug naar de top te loodsen. De komende jaren zal ik veelvuldig met hem te maken krijgen. Daarnaast dompel ik mezelf onder in de wereld van McLaren Automotive. Ik heb een McLaren in mijn verzameling straatauto's en het is echt een superbe machine."

Reacties (37)

Login om te reageren
  • Yeah! The Flying Finn is back! #GOMIKA

    • + 0
    • 16 maa 2017 - 14:53
    • de originele, niet die nepperd die nooit iets zegt!

      • + 0
      • 16 maa 2017 - 17:34
    • Hakkinen een nepperd die nooit iets zegt? Mika is een hele vrolijke gast hoor en altijd in voor een dolletje. Om over zijn rijkwaliteiten nog maar te zwijgen, of bedoel je iemand anders?

      • + 0
      • 16 maa 2017 - 17:41
    • JustSaying

      Posts: 55

      Schwantz, begrijpend lezen is moeilijk hé? Playfast heeft het over die ANDERE Fin, degene die nooit wat zegt = Raikkönen

      • + 2
      • 16 maa 2017 - 18:33
    • Ja blijft uitermate lastig @JS. Maar een droogkloot die zo origineel is als Kimi, een nepperd te noemen, slaat natuurlijk nergens op.

      • + 1
      • 16 maa 2017 - 18:59
    • JustSaying

      Posts: 55

      Dat ben ik helemaal met je eens, Swantz. Als er één persoon is die geen nepperd is, is het Kimi wel!

      • + 0
      • 17 maa 2017 - 17:22
  • Stitch

    Posts: 5.441

    "McLaren-directeur Zak Brown, die een McLaren uit 2001 bezit." en "Ik heb een McLaren in mijn verzameling straatauto's en het is echt een superbe machine." Dat schept een band natuurlijk ;-) Net postzegels verzamelen ...

    • + 2
    • 16 maa 2017 - 14:58
    • Ik dacht het zelfde..

      • + 0
      • 16 maa 2017 - 15:02
    • En tijdens de bespreking moest ik naar het toilet en wat denk je? Ja Zak moest ook. Dat noem ik geen toeval meer. ;)

      • + 1
      • 16 maa 2017 - 18:27
  • RSV MILLE

    Posts: 698

    Hij is ook ambassadeur voor Mercedes...
    En laat nou 1 van de eigenaren van McLaren contact hebben opgenomen met Mercedes...
    Honda moet nu wel echt heel snel een betrouwbare en krachtigere motor gaan leveren
    anders is het na 2017 einde verhaal en een verliespost van pak hem beet 150 miljoen...

    • + 0
    • 16 maa 2017 - 15:07
    • Arran

      Posts: 1.163

      150mil..... sorry voor jou en mij heel veel geld, maar dit bedrag is in F1 termen, wisselgeld.

      Zeker voor Honda, is het gezichtsverlies vele malen zwaarder te verkroppen als die 150mil.
      Volgens mij ben jij nog niet geheel op de hoogte van Japanse Bedrijfscultuur.

      Geloof me, dit is persoonlijk geworden voor Honda..
      Die geven niet eerder op als dat die motor WK's gaat winnen, of het bedrijf falliet is, of de hoge baas HariKiri heeft gepleegt

      • + 0
      • 16 maa 2017 - 15:13
    • szixxx

      Posts: 4.754

      @Arran: Ja, dat hebben we nog gezien van de vorige periode dat Honda in de F1 was met zijn eigen team. Ze zijn kampioen geworden, met een Mercedes motor :-)

      • + 1
      • 16 maa 2017 - 15:38
    • SZIXXX, dat was Brawn GP, niet Honda.

      • + 0
      • 16 maa 2017 - 20:08
    • Dat weet hij, het is duidelijk sarcastisch bedoeld. Overigens was die Brawn GP gewoon de wagen van Honda.

      • + 0
      • 17 maa 2017 - 00:04
    • RSV MILLE

      Posts: 698

      Arran,
      kan wel zijn dat het wisselgeld is voor Honda maar als McLaren Alonso binnenboort wil houden dan moet er wel een motor komen die goed moet zijn voor het podium. En als dat niet gebeurt dan stopt McLaren met de samenwerking of Honda dat nou wil of niet en dan hebben ze toch echt 3 jaar lang zichzelf belachelijk gemaakt en 150 Miljoen weggegooid.

      • + 0
      • 17 maa 2017 - 01:48
  • Kennie

    Posts: 2.576

    Hakkinen was mijn held :-) En is het eigenlijk nog steeds! Ik ben blij dat hij terug is bij McLaren.

    • + 1
    • 16 maa 2017 - 15:52
    • Exact

      Posts: 317

      Zijn vrouw werd vroeger Altijd in beeld genomen. Door de regisseur wel te verstaan!

      • + 0
      • 16 maa 2017 - 16:46
    • Hakkinen is idd een held! Was super snel, een karakter op zich en een groot kampioen!

      • + 1
      • 16 maa 2017 - 17:22
    • Nou, inderdaad, bloedirritant was dat zeg. Als de linkervoorband een beetje blokkeerde van Hakkinen was dat mens al in beeld. Het had veel gescheeld als ze aardig om te zien was, maar helaas.

      • + 0
      • 16 maa 2017 - 17:34
    • @Exact
      Ik kan me zelfs herinneren dat er beweerd werd dat Erja vaker in beeld was dan een Minardi. Een paar merken hebben toen overwogen om haar zelfs te gaan sponsoren, puur wanwege de frequente tv-time.

      • + 1
      • 16 maa 2017 - 19:52
    • Waaruit maar weer blijkt dat Lotus het dus helemaal verkeerd aanpakte met Carmen; een lelijk wijf krijgt veel meer airtime. ;-)

      • + 0
      • 16 maa 2017 - 20:10
    • Ja zijn ex was geen beauty, z’n huidige vriendin is een beter merk.

      • + 0
      • 16 maa 2017 - 20:30
    • Hakkinen stopte toch oa om meer bij zijn vrouw te zijn? Uiteindelijk kwam er een scheiding. Heb er nooit veel van begrepen:p.

      Gelukkig kwam in die tijd de vriendin van Coulthard ook af en toe in beeld. In de categorie mag er meer dan zijn!

      • + 1
      • 16 maa 2017 - 20:45
    • Hakkinen stopte omdat hij het niet meer kon opbrengen. Hij had blijvend last van zijn zware crash in 95 en de pijn werd erger.

      • + 0
      • 17 maa 2017 - 00:04
  • had mika toch liever in de roll gezien als opvolger van charlie whiting

    • + 0
    • 16 maa 2017 - 17:01
    • Kan nog steeds toch. Zakje geld doet wonderen.

      • + 0
      • 16 maa 2017 - 17:36
  • Zal hij ook een raceoverall hebben aangepast? ;)

    • + 0
    • 16 maa 2017 - 18:32
  • Mika heeft ook nog steeds uitstekende contacten met Mercedes. Wegbereider voor de motorwissel?

    • + 0
    • 16 maa 2017 - 20:11
  • J-HO

    Posts: 172

    God's Right Foot back where he belongs!!!! Mijn grootste sportheld ever

    • + 0
    • 16 maa 2017 - 20:34
  • J-HO

    Posts: 172

    Een van de mooiste artikelen die ik gelezen heb over Häkkinen, door Martin Brundle die naast beiden heeft gereden en dus met autoriteit kan praten over de vergelijking met Michael Schumacher:

    Schuey v Mika By Martin Brundle ITV-F1's Martin Brundle is a remarkable man. Once a top-line Formula 1 driver, he is now televised sport's most expert 'expert'. He has also been a team-mate in F1 to both Michael Schumacher and Mika Hakkinen. Never before has he rolled out the anecdotes, compared and contrasted the two men's characters, spilled the beans. Until now. Who better to deliver final judgement?

    Michael Schumacher and Mika Hakkinen are the two men to beat in Formula 1 today. But you don't need me to tell you that their records speak for themselves. Conventional wisdom says that Michael is number one, Mika number two. But, like everything in F1, it's not as simple as that. I know both men pretty well. I was Michael's team-mate at Benetton in 1992, and Mika's at McLaren in '94. And, as a commentator for ITV Sport, it's been my job to analyse and interview them from a journalistic perspective for the past four years.

    So who's better, in my view? Well, it's a close call. Michael is unbelievably confident, -always was. I remember one particular debrief in '92. Tom Walkinshaw, Ross Brawn, Rory Byrne and myself had all agreed on a certain strategy - whereupon Michael, in his first full season of F1, said, "No, I don't agree." It wasn't an arcane point, but Michael was demonstrably wrong. It was almost comical, in fact. But what I found remarkable was that he was prepared to argue against all that experience. That really impressed me. And, even better, once his argument had been laboriously dismantled, he had the good grace to say, "Sorry. You were right. I was wrong."
    He's a nice man off the track, but he has always been ruthless on it. He tried to have me off the track several times in '92. But, again, one day in '95, when he was still at Benetton and I'd moved to Ligier, over dinner he said, "I now realise how wrong it was to fight my team-mate like that back in '92." So he's not the arrogant and aloof champion people make him out to be.

    He was always a thinker though, even in the early days. I remember Spa '92, when we were running nose to tail in the rain, him ahead. As we came through Raidillon I felt a lot of grip, and I thought, "I'm coming in for slicks." A few corners later, at Pouhon, I felt it again, and I thought, "Yes, this lap." Then Michael went off the road at Stavelot, gathered it up on the wet grass, just missing the barrier - I'll never know how - and I thought, "Maybe there's not so much grip. I'll do one more lap." I was aware that Thierry Boutsen had already taken slicks and had immediately crashed heavily. Anyway, the pitstop entry was after the Bus Stop in those days, and Michael was right on my tail - really on it as we braked for that challenging chicane. And yet what he was doing was checking out my rear tyres! You see, it's hard to examine your own, because on the straights you just see a blur; and in the corners you don't really want to be spending too much time looking in your mirrors. You're kind of busy with the view ahead. And that was a clever thing of Michael to do, in the heat of the moment, having just gone off at a fast corner, at Spa, in the wet. Remarkable.

    Of course, Michael saw the damage on my tyres and decided to take the slicks that I suppose I should have had. And he won the race. It's those pivotal moments that make the difference between being good and being great. I think that story shows the mental capacity he had -even then, in his first full F1 season -to drive an F1 car on the ragged edge and at the same time think analytically about what was going on around him.

    Mika is a very different animal. I didn't have a great relationship with him in '94. It was a difficult time for McLaren. Ayrton Senna had left to join Williams, then he died and the team, McLaren, were to grief-stricken. In their eyes I wasn't Ayrton - and nor was Mika. The Peugeot engines were unreliable, and the car wasn't top-drawer. So Mika and I were under strain. We didn't get on that well and a lot of it was my fault, I now admit. I was new to the team while Mika had been there a year already, and I was on the back foot a lot of the time, having signed for the drive just 72 hours before first practice for the first race.

    I like to think I've got a good relationship with Mika now, but he will never be as chatty as Michael. Michael likes a good long talk. -I once chewed the fat with him for three hours solid on a long flight. Not Mika. On the face of it, he's quite taciturn. But that's only half the story. There are two Mika Hakkinens, you see. There's the press conference Mika - the taciturn one - and the private Mika. And the private Mika is a bit of a party animal, to be honest. People who don't know him sometimes think he's thick, but he's far from thick. He's a quiet thinker. He's highly intelligent, in fact - you don't win two world drivers' championships without being extremely bright. But, more than that, he's streetwise. Michael is a far more readable book. Mika minimizes extraneous mental clutter. In '94 I remember going with him to the circuit from the airport, somewhere or other, and he was driving. As we approached each slip road, he would automatically take it. And I'd shout, "No, no, Mika. Not this way." And he'd cruise back on to the motorway. And it would be the same at the next junction. I gradually realised that he didn't really want to learn the way. I'd always travel with pre-packed maps and directions -a grand prix dossier, if you like- because I'm that type of person. But Mika didn't want his mind to be encumbered by that kind of trivia. Similarly, Mika has managed to avoid the level of superstardom that Michael has to cope with. Is that accidental, or is it that he shuns the limelight for strategic reasons?

    So much for their character. One thing's for sure: Mika isn't about to tell anyone the answer to that question. But what of their in-cockpit approaches? Well, their driving styles are similar. They both drive the car slightly 'loose'. They can both live with a car that's moving around at the back - Michael more so than Mika. Michael is very acrobatic. So many F1 cars tend to move progressively towards oversteer during the life of the tyres, yet Michael can live with that happily. And I think it's that ability to improvise in an attacking way - to adapt to changing grip levels and variable 'feel' - that makes him so strong in a race. Michael can operate very close to a constantly-changing limit while that mutation is occurring. As a result, in the wet -or, more specifically, in inconsistent drizzle he's unbeatable. Mika is good in the rain, but Michael is in another league. He's also supremely good at reading a race. Better than anyone else, he can take on board what he's being told over the radio, and respond accordingly on the track. Ferrari have won a lot of races that way. Michael can turn up the wick where Mika sometimes doesn't seem able to.

    But, perhaps counter-intuitively, when the chips are down in a crunch race I'd put my money on Mika. We've seen that a few times now -Nürburgring '98 and Suzuka '99 spring to mind. Historically, when it's man against man, Mika is more likely to deliver the perfect race under pressure than Michael is. And the reason is that Michael is more liable to overdrive in those circumstances.

    In extremis, Mika makes fewer mistakes. As a team-mate, you tend to focus on your opposite number's performance in the 'hero' corners -ultra-fast places like Eau Rouge, 130R and so on -and there's no doubt that both men were extremely brave at places like that. They still are. But of the two of them it was Mika who really caught my attention in the white-knuckle, hold-your-breath-and-pray department. You'd look at his telemetry traces and say to yourself, "How can that be possible? How can he do that?" In dry qualifying, he really opened my eyes on a few occasions. Michael was more consistent, more always there, every corner, every lap. Besides, there's often very little actual time to be gained in the quick corners. It's in the slow turns - long second-or third-gear bends in which you spend a lot more time than you do in superfast fifth - or sixth-gear flicks, for example -that real time can be won. Both drivers have a truly fantastic ability to maintain apex minimum speed in apparently straightforward corners - to prevent the appearance of a V-shaped dip in the track-speed line on their telemetry traces, if you like. With both of them, the apex deceleration is smoothed out - it's more of a U than a V - and I've rarely seen that. It only works out as a couple of miles per hour, but it's consistently there and it makes a significant cumulative difference.
    So how is it achieved? Mika uses the pedals smoothly. He didn't always brake later than I did - in fact, I often braked later than Mika and I think David Coulthard does the same today - but Mika is very good at synchronising the application and release of throttle and brakes.

    Michael is also strong in this area, but he likes to steer the car with the throttle a bit more than Mika does. He's not quite as fluid. The net result is remarkably similar: a higher apex minimum speed, and the ability to set the car up for that apex so that once power is applied, the car is straighter sooner - so it's ready to accelerate away from the corner earlier and faster.
    Again, it's Mika who is slightly better here. He always seemed able to apply virtually full throttle very early and have less wheelspin than I was having with less throttle. I looked at it very carefully in '94, and I think the key was, is, - the couple of degrees of controlled sliding that he introduces to the car on the turn-in. If you're sideways, you're wasting time, but that's not what we're talking about here. We're talking about arriving at a corner, dialling in a smidgen of attitude, and springboarding off that attitude rather than correcting it. Michael achieves something very similar by teasing the back end of the car with the throttle. And I'm talking about graph paper now -telemetry, computers, science, fact. Black and white. Those two guys can maintain forward motion more of the time than most others can. And in slow corners -places like Club at Silverstone - it delivers real, tangible benefit. Although their slightly differing approaches achieve extremely similar results, Mika's technique is a little smoother - the result is, predictably, that Michael uses his tyres more heavily. Lately, that has helped him in qualifying. He can get hard tyres working hotter earlier than Mika can -but it can punish him during a race if tyre degradation is a factor.

    Mika maximises the width of the track better than anybody else - but, again, Michael is very close. They 'widen' the track - ease the racing line - in different ways. Mika turns in from a very wide line - he isn't afraid to brake on the white lines that mark the track perimeter (except in the wet, of course, when to do so is suicidal). In fact, he uses the paint to induce the attitude I mentioned earlier. In fact, in qualifying Mika will sometimes even take to the grass on entry. Michael approaches corners from a narrower angle, but often uses more apex kerb than Mika does - especially in qualifying. Overall, though, Mika is the better qualifier. At McLaren we used to talk about "ringing the three bells" - which meant getting all three lap sectors just right. Mika was brilliant at it, and he's even better now. He can build up to a truly spectacular qualifying run. Again, a Mika pole lap will be smooth, crisp and faultless -where a Michael equivalent will be a tad more ragged. He might overcook it in one corner and lose a tenth. It's still pole, but it isn't quite as perfect. In terms of overtaking and lapping, they are both extremely good. I couldn't choose between the two. Michael has a small advantage in that his car is red. I really believe that. It just shows up in your mirrors in a way that a grey car never can. I'm thinking of Senna here: a Day-Glo yellow helmet sticking out of a Day-Glo orange Formula 1 car.

    If the Senna-McLaren combo was 100% intimidation, then Schumacher-Ferrari is 95% and Hakkinen-McLaren 90%. If Michael has one significant chink in his armour, it's his starting. He isn't good at it. At Benetton Michael could outqualify me, but I'm sure he was usually looking in his mirrors at the start.
    As a result he ran into a lot of people on lap one, trying to work out where I was going to be at the first corner. Mika is a magnificent starter. Starting is all about the head. OK, you need skill, balancing revs and clutch and throttle and so on,- but it's a pretty mechanical task, in truth. The real problem is doing it under pressure - and the pressure, for the likes of Michael and Mika, is intense. Mika's starting is the barometer by which all others in F1 today should measure theirs whereas, for Michael, it's a constant cause of trouble. Not only does his mediocre performance in this area lose him places before the first corner but it also gets him into accidents.Too often he's moving backwards relative to cars behind him, which lead to first-corner shunts like those at Hockenheim and Austria last year. And that's why Mika is so hard to beat: because he's a fantastic qualifier and a fabulous starter, he's likely to be first into the first corner a very high proportion of the time. And that puts him in control from the beginning.
    Even so, I think Michael will be an even tougher proposition in 2001. Now that the ghost of 1979 has been laid to rest, and Ferrari have got their elusive drivers' championship at last, I think he'll be a bit good. He may even step up a level. But the same could be true of Mika. - Michael certainly thinks so. He recently said he thought Mika would be strengthened by becoming a father, -the theory being that in times of stress a stable home life helps you get through. Mind you, Mika has always been very strong under pressure.

    So, who is the better? I've got to stick my neck out, haven't I? You'd never forgive me if I signed off without giving one or other of them the nod. Let me put it this way. Of all the drivers I've raced against, the best was Senna. No question. In terms of the whole package, Michael runs him pretty close, with Mika a close third. In terms of raw, God-given talent, Senna is still number one - but it's Mika, not Michael, who comes closest. If Michael Schumacher and Mika Hakkinen were in the same Formula 1 team, with the same equipment, during qualifying, in the dry, and you asked me to stake my kids' building society accounts on who would bag the pole, I'd put my money on Mika. But Michael would win the race. There, I've said it.'

    • + 2
    • 16 maa 2017 - 20:38
    • mooi verhaal... dat stukje over intimidatie is ook zeer interessant. Max lijkt dat zeker te hebben, en ik vind het ook altijd opvallend dat Vettel zenuwachtig wordt als Ricciardo in de buurt is. Alonso heeft het ook, trouwens.

      • + 0
      • 17 maa 2017 - 11:32
  • heel verhaal lekker kort, haha .de car was great an the team was fantstic !

    • + 0
    • 17 maa 2017 - 03:50
  • Altijd een geweldige coureur gevonden die Mika Hakkinen, ondanks dat ik eigenlijk een beetje Schumi fan was. De strijd tussen die 2 was ook epic.

    • + 0
    • 17 maa 2017 - 08:43
    • ja, en respectvol ook... in tegenstelling tot veel andere gevechten.

      • + 0
      • 17 maa 2017 - 11:19
  • Scheelt weer een tiende per rondje! Goed bezig hoor!

    • + 0
    • 17 maa 2017 - 11:18
  • Valt er nog iets te ambassedeuren daar dan?

    • + 0
    • 17 maa 2017 - 11:38
  • Ik ben er blij mee als McLaren fan.

    • + 0
    • 17 maa 2017 - 12:28

RU Grand Prix van Rusland

Lokale tijd 

Bekijk meer foto's

RU Grand Prix van Rusland

Lokale tijd 

Bekijk meer foto's

Gerelateerd nieuws

WK standen 2021

Bekijk volledige WK-stand

Test kalender

Bahrain International Circuit - Wintertest

Bekijk het volledige testschema

Geef je mening

De Formule 1-bolide van 2022 is mooier dan de huidige?

Team profiel

Bekijk volledig profiel

Formule 1 kalender - 2021

Datum
Grand Prix
Circuit
-
Bahrein
26 - 28 maa
Bahrein
16 - 18 apr
Italië
7 - 9 mei
Spanje
20 - 23 mei
Monaco
4 - 6 jun
Azerbeidzjan
18 - 20 jun
Frankrijk
25 - 27 jun
Oostenrijk
2 - 4 jul
Oostenrijk
16 - 18 jul
Groot Brittannië
30 - 1 aug
Hongarije
27 - 29 aug
België
3 - 5 sep
Nederland
10 - 12 sep
Italië
24 - 26 sep
Rusland
1 - 3 okt
Singapore
8 - 10 okt
Japan
22 - 24 okt
Verenigde Staten van Amerika
29 - 31 okt
Mexico (land)
5 - 7 nov
Brazilië
19 - 21 nov
Australië
3 - 5 dec
Saoedi-Arabië
10 - 12 dec
Verenigde Arabische Emiraten
Bekijk volledige kalender

Formule 1 kalender - 2021

Datum
Grand Prix & Circuit
26 - 28 maa
16 - 18 apr
7 - 9 mei
20 - 23 mei
Monaco Monte Carlo
4 - 6 jun
Azerbeidzjan Baku City Circuit
18 - 20 jun
Frankrijk Paul Ricard
25 - 27 jun
Oostenrijk Red Bull Ring
2 - 4 jul
Oostenrijk Red Bull Ring
16 - 18 jul
Groot Brittannië Silverstone
30 - 1 aug
Hongarije Hungaroring
27 - 29 aug
3 - 5 sep
Nederland Circuit Zandvoort
10 - 12 sep
Italië Monza
24 - 26 sep
Rusland Sochi Autodrom
1 - 3 okt
8 - 10 okt
22 - 24 okt
Verenigde Staten van Amerika Circuit of the Americas
29 - 31 okt
5 - 7 nov
Brazilië Interlagos
19 - 21 nov
Australië Albert Park
3 - 5 dec
Saoedi-Arabië Jeddah Street Circuit
10 - 12 dec
Verenigde Arabische Emiraten Yas Marina Circuit
Bekijk volledige kalender
show sidebar