A trio of former F1 drivers are hoping the 2015 season opener was just a blip. In Australia, Sauber battled for survival in court with Giedo van der Garde while Manor never left the pits, before the smallest field in recent memory set the scene for what Daniel Ricciardo called a "boring" race as Mercedes utterly dominated.
Afterwards, Red Bull threatened to quit in protest of the technical regulations, leaving F1 experts and pundits to wonder if the fundamentals of the sport are broken. "I tried to watch, but I got to a point when I couldn't stay awake," Rubens Barrichello, the longest-serving driver in F1 history, admitted to Brazil's Globo.
Former Renault driver Nelson Piquet jr added: "I didn't see the race, but I heard about it and it was a shame that only 15 or 16 cars started. It's a shame formula one is at that level. We want it to be back again when it was competitive, with many very strong cars."
Finally, former McLaren driver and long-time commentator John Watson told the Daily Mail: "The sport, whether it is the governing body, the FIA or CVC, need to sit down and say 'What are we doing? What are we trying to achieve? And are we achieving it?'" (GMM)
Hey Rubens, trust me, that's what happens when you get old!! What is wrong with all these commentators? Half of F1 has always been what happens away from the track; in that respect, Australia was quite entertaining, and the race wasn't that bad either - unless you just wanted the most prepared team to lose. (Then perhaps this "sport" isn't for you?) I will say that there is one issue, in that, since the "sport" now prevents true innovation and development in pursuit of "cost reduction," it's much harder to recover from an initial misstep. (Did anyone tell these guys that "tokens" are for "Mario Cart?") If Ferrari and/or Renault could (and were allowed to) develop their engines (oops, power units) to something comparably close to MB, then this discussion would be Moot!!! All it takes is time and money! (And unfortunately, they will have to find a grownup to sign the excuse note to let them do it!) If they aren't willing to do that, then they deserve to fall by the wayside. (The track is where they should be able to prove their merit!! Not the merit itself.)
Would you like to stay up to date with the latest Lewis Hamilton and Formula 1 news from GPtoday? Activate free push notifications and be the first to know!
1
Azerbaijan Grand Prix
I. Hadjar
A. Antonelli
C. Leclerc
24 members have this team as their favourite
Replies (1)
Login to replyscf1fan
Posts: 58
Hey Rubens, trust me, that's what happens when you get old!! What is wrong with all these commentators? Half of F1 has always been what happens away from the track; in that respect, Australia was quite entertaining, and the race wasn't that bad either - unless you just wanted the most prepared team to lose. (Then perhaps this "sport" isn't for you?) I will say that there is one issue, in that, since the "sport" now prevents true innovation and development in pursuit of "cost reduction," it's much harder to recover from an initial misstep. (Did anyone tell these guys that "tokens" are for "Mario Cart?") If Ferrari and/or Renault could (and were allowed to) develop their engines (oops, power units) to something comparably close to MB, then this discussion would be Moot!!! All it takes is time and money! (And unfortunately, they will have to find a grownup to sign the excuse note to let them do it!) If they aren't willing to do that, then they deserve to fall by the wayside. (The track is where they should be able to prove their merit!! Not the merit itself.)