Ricciardo confused over lack of qualifying pace

  • Published on 15 Sep 2018 17:49
  • comments 5
  • By: Fergal Walsh

Daniel Ricciardo was left confused following qualifying for the Singapore Grand Prix, after setting the sixth fastest time. Ricciardo appeared to be in the fight during the first and second qualifying sessions, even setting the quickest time in Q1.

However, he couldn't keep up his pace in the final stage, while teammate Max Verstappen went on the qualify on the front row. The Australian was left disappointed with his performance but can't explain his drop off in pace, stating that a minor engine problem wasn't the cause.

"To be honest, we had a little bit [of engine issues] but it wasn’t the reason why we dropped so much pace in qualifying. Right now I honestly don’t have an answer,” Ricciardo admitted.

“We were there, we made changes after P3 this morning. As a driver you know immediately if a change works and in Q1 it felt like it was there and we were like: ‘Sweet, we are going to be in this thing.’ It seemed like everyone else could run with it, through Q2, Q3, find a second if not more and we just stayed as a stalemate. I don’t know why we were the only ones who couldn’t find the time right now.”

Ricciardo said on Friday evening that Red Bull had the fastest race pace out of the top three teams. However, as he is starting behind both Ferraris, Mercedes and his teammate, the 29-year-old is not so optimistic for the race.

"Right now, I am struggling to let qualifying go. It’s still too soon,” Ricciardo said. “Even with good pace here, it’s so tricky to overtake. We will try and do something.

“All we can hope for if the cars in front, their tyres fall away and they’re forced then to do a two-stop. Otherwise, if everyone does a one-stop, hope for someone to run on the track like they did in 2015 I guess,” he added.

Replies (5)

Login to reply
  • Engine issues again... I found the 3 pu allocation stupid as it was, and the fact that they retain it when Renault and Honda are where they are really put the final nail in the coffin for me.

    • + 0
    • Sep 16 2018 - 06:13
    • boudy

      Posts: 1,168

      Engine issues indeed, Not supplying to any team that could be an competition is the real reason. Renault and Honda will come closer with their performance over the next couple of years. At the moment I can't see any reason to change the powerunit specs apart from somehow making it easier for independent PU suppliers to get into F1. What I would like to see is that the release the regulations around battery usage and allow to do more with electrical energy which is more inline with today's requirement to become less dependable on fuel.

      • + 0
      • Sep 16 2018 - 07:04
    • They will probably improve, but I wonder if they will improve enough. They are at least one year behind Ferrari and Mercedes, and so the 3 PU allocations hurt their teams the most. At this rate, F1 is in a catch 22 scenario, in which we kinda need them to do some BoP to boost the B tier PUs, but at the same time such a move would be unfair to the A tier PUs who got their stuff together.

      I too wouldnt mind the FIA releasing the electric restrictions, but I only think it'd benefit Ferrari. Both Honda and Renault still struggle with the electric component, so it wouldnt help them in the slightest.

      • + 0
      • Sep 16 2018 - 10:57
    • boudy

      Posts: 1,168

      Maybe we should write an technical directive that can be implemented by the Fia. I believe that it might benefit Renault more than the others because of their involvement with FE. We're on the same trail of thought.

      • + 0
      • Sep 16 2018 - 13:29
    • Oh yes definitely. Nevermind the FIA, here comes the BCA!

      • + 0
      • Sep 16 2018 - 15:51

BE Grand Prix of Belgium

Local time 

BEGrand Prix of Belgium

Local time 

World Championship standings 2024

Show full world champion standings

Test calendar

See full test schedule

Related news

Give your opinion!

Will Bottas challenge Hamilton for the world championship in 2020?

Formula 1 Calendar - 2024

Date
Grand Prix
Circuit
-
Bahrain
29 - Mar 2
Bahrain
7 - Mar 9
Saudi Arabia
22 - Mar 24
Australia
5 - Apr 7
Japan
19 - Apr 21
China
3 - May 5
United States of America
17 - May 19
Italy
24 - May 26
Monaco
7 - Jun 9
Canada
21 - Jun 23
Spain
28 - Jun 30
Austria
5 - Jul 7
United Kingdom
19 - Jul 21
Hungary
26 - Jul 28
Belgium
23 - Aug 25
Netherlands
30 - Sep 1
Italy
13 - Sep 15
Azerbaijan
20 - Sep 22
Singapore
18 - Oct 20
United States of America
25 - Oct 27
Mexico
1 - Nov 3
Brazil
22 - Nov 24
United States of America
29 - Dec 1
Qatar
6 - Dec 8
United Arab Emirates
See full schedule

Formula 1 Calendar - 2024

Date
Grand Prix & Circuit
29 - Mar 2
7 - Mar 9
Saudi Arabia Jeddah Street Circuit
22 - Mar 24
Australia Albert Park
5 - Apr 7
19 - Apr 21
3 - May 5
United States of America Miami International Autodrome
17 - May 19
24 - May 26
Monaco Monte Carlo
7 - Jun 9
21 - Jun 23
28 - Jun 30
Austria Red Bull Ring
5 - Jul 7
United Kingdom Silverstone
19 - Jul 21
Hungary Hungaroring
26 - Jul 28
23 - Aug 25
Netherlands Circuit Zandvoort
30 - Sep 1
Italy Monza
13 - Sep 15
Azerbaijan Baku City Circuit
20 - Sep 22
18 - Oct 20
United States of America Circuit of the Americas
25 - Oct 27
1 - Nov 3
Brazil Interlagos
22 - Nov 24
United States of America Las Vegas Street Circuit
29 - Dec 1
6 - Dec 8
United Arab Emirates Yas Marina Circuit
See full schedule

Driver profile

  • Team Red Bull Racing
  • Points 2,638
  • Podiums 100
  • Grand Prix 188
  • Country NL
  • Date of b. Sep 30 1997 (26)
  • Place of b. Hasselt (Belgie), NL
  • Weight 70 kg
  • Length 1.8 m
Show full profile

Team profile

Show full profile
show sidebar