Berger backs new Honda technical director

  • 15 Mar 2018 11:37
  • comments 10
  • By: Rob Veenstra

Gerhard Berger thinks Honda is on track to improve in formula one. The McLaren collaboration in 2015-2017 was so bad that the British team dumped Honda, leaving the Japanese manufacturer to switch to Toro Rosso for 2018.

But winter testing results for Toro Rosso-Honda were good, and Honda also spent the winter restructuring its organisation. The Japan Times reports that F1 boss Yusuke Hasegawa departed, while experienced engineer Toyoharu Tanabe was appointed as technical boss.

Former McLaren-Honda driver Gerhard Berger told Austrian Servus TV: "I had to smile when I saw my old engineer, who worked on my car for three years, as the new Honda technical director."

"He is really good, so I can imagine that with Toro Rosso, Franz Tost and the power of Red Bull behind them, they will do well. It's a good sign that Honda has been doing well in reliability," Berger added. "It's a company with a great sporting culture." (GMM)

Replies (10)

Login to reply
  • After testing it's a big confusion who was the blame about Mclaren Honda 2015-2017 reliability. We wil see soon :)

    • + 0
    • Mar 15 2018 - 11:44
    • Hepp

      Posts: 198

      I see it as Ron Dennis wanting to do too much his own way and Honda just not capable of keeping up to his micro-managing.

      • + 0
      • Mar 15 2018 - 13:30
    • I honestly dont know what more there is to see: they were both to blame.

      • + 0
      • Mar 15 2018 - 17:05
    • Kean

      Posts: 474

      I say they were both to blame, McLaren were to blame because they demanded too much from Honda and the packaging of the PU in order to be able run their aero exactly they way they wanted. Honda on the other hand kept promising to meet their demands. It should have been a partnership where they can meet in the middle, but McLaren kept insisting on a certain architecture and Honda were unable to confess to the fact that they couldn't deliver instead they promised to do so. Now when McLaren are running the Renault PU, their design philosophy is not to their benefit, because the Renault takes up larger space at the rear. I think that's why we're seeing McLaren struggle and Toro Rosso does not. McLaren are squeezing in a larger PU in their (un-altered) design philosophy, while STR are able to put a more compact PU in their design philosophy.

      • + 0
      • Mar 15 2018 - 19:12
    • Barron

      Posts: 625

      I think the McLaren has followed the Red Bull aero philosophy quite closely over the past 3 years and today there seems little difference at least in the upper rear bodywork area. Red Bull had big problems with the cooling here 3 years ago and McLaren, like RB before them, ended up hacking holes in the bodywork. All F1 designers like to keep this crucial area as thin as possible because it directly impacts on the airflow over the rear wing and they hate compromising. Where the design implications went really wrong for Honda was the location of the turbo & MGU-H which was far too small and constantly overheated. Once they followed (copied?) the Mercedes layout, problems diminished. It’s interesting though, what kind of engineer knowingly follows faulty logic? If Honda had even once said “No” to the ‘size zero’ concept, I can’t see how McLaren could have forced them? Definitely a 50/50 situation.

      • + 0
      • Mar 16 2018 - 10:23
    • Barron

      Posts: 625

      PS if ‘compact’ means less weight for the same output then it’s a win, but often ‘compact’ can also mean compromises on performance especially in turbo motors where block strength is vital and strong means heavy.

      • + 0
      • Mar 16 2018 - 10:26
    • They tried and failed to follow the Red Bull philosophy. A key component to RB's designs are the flexibility: they can run low drag modes as well as high drag modes very successfully, something McLaren couldnt do even with the 2017 spec chassis, their best chassis in several years. Did Honda overpromise? Certainly with Arai, but of the two, I'd say the one overpromising were McLaren. But the relationship was wrong from the start.

      As for the last point: thats the key area they had issues with with the 2015-2016 design, hence the new design for 2017.

      • + 0
      • Mar 16 2018 - 16:49
  • I dont really have any reference to Tanabe, I guess I will have to do some reading on him. BUt IMO, they should've retained Hasegawa to some extent.

    • + 0
    • Mar 15 2018 - 17:18
    • UncleElias

      Posts: 5

      Hasegawa was brought over from the consumer production side. He still held that title as well as being given F1 responsibilities. Honda removed his F1 responsibilities and broke that job into two. They then had Hasegawa go back to being solely responsible for his prior job.

      At least, that's how I understand the whole merry go round.

      • + 1
      • Mar 17 2018 - 21:45
    • Yup, thats the way it was done. I had however hoped that he'd go over to F1 fulltime, and that they'd replace him on the other side of business. But I suppose Tanabe might be equally competent.

      • + 0
      • Mar 19 2018 - 17:45



BH Grand Prix of Bahrain

Local time 

  • Friday weather-image

    Saturday weather-image

    Sunday weather-image

  • Free practice 1

    12:00 - 13:30

    Free practice 3

    13:00 - 14:00

    Race

    17:10 - 19:10

  • Free practice 2

    16:00 - 17:30

    Qualifying

    16:00 - 17:00

    Fastest lap

     

BH Grand Prix of Bahrain

Local time 

  • Fridayweather-image

  • Free practice 1

    12:00 - 13:30

    Free practice 2

    16:00 - 17:30

  • Saturdayweather-image

  • Free practice 3

    13:00 - 14:00

    Qualifying

    16:00 - 17:00

  • Sunday weather-image

  • Race

    17:10 - 19:10

    Fastest lap

    17:10 - 19:10



Test calendar

Circuit de Catalunya - Winter testing

Circuit de Catalunya - Winter testing

See full test schedule

Give your opinion!

Do you think Claire Williams should step down at Williams?


World Championship standings 2019

Show full world champion standings

Team profile

Show full profile

Formula 1 Calendar - 2019

Date
Grand Prix
Circuit
-
Spain
-
Spain
15 - Mar 17
Australia
29 - Mar 31
Bahrain
12 - Apr 14
China
26 - Apr 28
Azerbaijan
10 - May 12
Spain
24 - May 26
Monaco
7 - Jun 9
Canada
21 - Jun 23
France
28 - Jun 30
Austria
12 - Jul 14
United Kingdom
26 - Jul 28
Germany
2 - Aug 4
Hungary
30 - Sep 1
Belgium
6 - Sep 8
Italy
20 - Sep 22
Singapore
27 - Sep 29
Russian
11 - Oct 13
Japan
25 - Oct 27
Mexico
1 - Nov 3
United States of America
15 - Nov 17
Brazil
29 - Dec 1
United Arab Emirates
See full schedule

Formula 1 Calendar - 2019

Date
Grand Prix & Circuit
15 - Mar 17
Australia Albert Park
29 - Mar 31
12 - Apr 14
26 - Apr 28
Azerbaijan Baku City Circuit
10 - May 12
24 - May 26
Monaco Monte Carlo
7 - Jun 9
21 - Jun 23
France Paul Ricard
28 - Jun 30
Austria Red Bull Ring
12 - Jul 14
United Kingdom Silverstone
26 - Jul 28
Germany Hockenheimring
2 - Aug 4
Hungary Hungaroring
30 - Sep 1
6 - Sep 8
Italy Monza
20 - Sep 22
27 - Sep 29
Russian Sochi Autodrom
11 - Oct 13
25 - Oct 27
1 - Nov 3
United States of America Circuit of the Americas
15 - Nov 17
Brazil Interlagos
29 - Dec 1
United Arab Emirates Yas Marina Circuit
See full schedule
show sidebar