IndyCar aeroscreen "only 10% as effective as Halo" in Leclerc crash

  • Published on 07 Sep 2018 18:53
  • comments 7
  • By: Fergal Walsh

Charlie Whiting has ruled that IndyCar's aeroscreen device that it has tested this year would only have been 10% as effective as the halo in Leclerc's Spa crash. Leclerc was involved in a heart-stopping incident two weeks ago, when the McLaren of Fernando Alonso flew over the top of him.

Alonso's right front tyre made contact with the halo, which broke the suspension on Alonso's car. After the race, Leclerc admitted that he was never a big fan of the halo, but said that he was happy it was over his head that day.

IndyCar is also looking at introducing head protection in the future. In 2015, Justin Wilson was killed following a hit on the head with debris at Pocono. The series has tested the aeroscreen twice this year - however Whiting says that the device would have been much less effective in the Leclerc crash.

"You’ve seen the sort of protection that they have been proposing and they’ve tested, similar to the Shield I think that Sebastian tried a couple of years ago in Silverstone,” said Whiting. “But I think what we’ve seen with Charles’ accident in Spa is that sort of thing wouldn’t have been nearly as effective. We’re looking at 10 percent of the protection that the Halo can offer, generally speaking.”

Robert Wickens was involved in a major crash at Pocono last month, which has left him with major injuries. Wickens' car was flung into a catch fence after making contact with Ryan Hunter-Reay. Despite IndyCar not being governed by the FIA, Whiting says the two are in contact over the performance of the catch fence.

“I think there are lessons that we can probably both learn from that because I think one of the things that was interesting about the accident was the way in which the car, after it hit the fences, what the fences can do at those speeds depending on the angle the car hits the fences.

“It’s supposed to deflect it but it gets hit on those very, very strong uprights which are necessary to stop it going into the crowd, but obviously it can also do things to the car and driver, as we saw with Dan Wheldon, for example,” Whiting added.

10% of 0 is still 0.

  • 2
  • Sep 7 2018 - 19:15

Replies (7)

Login to reply
  • 10% of 0 is still 0.

    • + 2
    • Sep 7 2018 - 19:15
  • Maybe, but it is a sorta compromise of better safety to better looks. Mind, it can probably be done better than the screen too.

    • + 0
    • Sep 7 2018 - 20:26
    • I wonder why can't one implement a hybrid of both.

      • + 0
      • Sep 7 2018 - 23:03
    • xoya

      Posts: 583

      You need some structure to hold it in place. A hybrid of aeroscreen and halo would only add windscreen to the openings on halo, adding worse visibility in raining conditions and not improving the looks.
      I'm thinking F1 will go closed cockpit in the next decade.

      • + 0
      • Sep 8 2018 - 01:51
    • That, and I dont really think they serve the same purposes. I dont really think the aeroscreen will help in heavy impact situations, whereas the screen is probably better at reflecting smaller debris coming from the front of the car. A hybrid (e.g scrapping that middlebarn and replacing it with a screen) could probably be able to strike a decent middleground. My only real issue with the screen is that it'd probably get really dirty on F1 tracks.

      • + 0
      • Sep 8 2018 - 15:55
  • Was expecting a bit more from Charlie than 10% or so generally speaking. It seems the FIA feels justified in their decision to use the halo so time to move on.

    • + 0
    • Sep 8 2018 - 23:38
  • Utter speculation by Whiting.

    • + 0
    • Sep 9 2018 - 14:23

BE Grand Prix of Belgium

Local time 16:16

BEGrand Prix of Belgium

Local time 16:16

World Championship standings 2025

Show full world champion standings

Test calendar

See full test schedule

Related news

Give your opinion!

Will Bottas challenge Hamilton for the world championship in 2020?

Formula 1 Calendar - 2025

Date
Grand Prix
Circuit
-
Bahrain
14 - Mar 16
Australia
21 - Mar 23
China
4 - Apr 6
Japan
11 - Apr 13
Bahrain
18 - Apr 20
Saudi Arabia
2 - May 4
United States of America
16 - May 18
Italy
23 - May 25
Monaco
30 - Jun 1
Spain
13 - Jun 15
Canada
27 - Jun 29
Austria
4 - Jul 6
United Kingdom
25 - Jul 27
Belgium
1 - Aug 3
Hungary
29 - Aug 31
Netherlands
5 - Sep 7
Italy
19 - Sep 21
Azerbaijan
3 - Oct 5
Singapore
17 - Oct 19
United States of America
24 - Oct 26
Mexico
7 - Nov 9
Brazil
21 - Nov 23
United States of America
28 - Nov 30
Qatar
5 - Dec 7
United Arab Emirates
See full schedule

Formula 1 Calendar - 2025

Date
Grand Prix & Circuit
14 - Mar 16
Australia Albert Park
21 - Mar 23
4 - Apr 6
11 - Apr 13
18 - Apr 20
Saudi Arabia Jeddah Street Circuit
2 - May 4
United States of America Miami International Autodrome
16 - May 18
23 - May 25
Monaco Monte Carlo
30 - Jun 1
13 - Jun 15
27 - Jun 29
Austria Red Bull Ring
4 - Jul 6
United Kingdom Silverstone
25 - Jul 27
1 - Aug 3
Hungary Hungaroring
29 - Aug 31
Netherlands Circuit Zandvoort
5 - Sep 7
Italy Monza
19 - Sep 21
Azerbaijan Baku City Circuit
3 - Oct 5
17 - Oct 19
United States of America Circuit of the Americas
24 - Oct 26
7 - Nov 9
Brazil Interlagos
21 - Nov 23
United States of America Las Vegas Street Circuit
28 - Nov 30
5 - Dec 7
United Arab Emirates Yas Marina Circuit
See full schedule

Driver profile

  • Team Aston Martin
  • Points 580
  • Podiums 9
  • Grand Prix 178
  • Country ES
  • Date of b. Jul 29 1981 (43)
  • Place of b. Oviedo, ES
  • Weight 68 kg
  • Length 1.71 m
Show full profile

Team profile

Show full profile
show sidebar