Analysis: It's all about the powers

  • Published on 16 Oct 2015 17:48
  • comments 0
  • By: Danny Sosef

F1 and power are inseparable. It’s not a coincidence, however, that ‘power’ covers both ‘engine power’ and ‘mightiness’. RedBull’s continuing struggle to find an engine – for us as viewers - seems to be all about the mechanical aspect, but is that really the case?

Media are overwhelming us, non-stop, with many contradictory stories and theories. What seemed to be so clear becomes unclear with the speed of sound. However, what most analyses on this subject ignore is the fact that indistinctness might be a goal of those who direct the ‘engine opera’ behind the scenes. Lets face it: indistinctness and ‘games’ are inherent to F1’s ruling politics.

In the beginning it all seemed oh so clear: RedBull wanted to replace Renault by a more competitive engine manufacturer and Renault claimed to be ‘very disappointed’ in the Energy Drinks Squad and talked about ‘serious marriage problems’. The only thing we know for sure is that RedBull and Renault still have a contract thus Scuderia Milton Keynes has an engine. Of course that’s not end of story, because having it doesn’t mean wanting it.

Cosworth 1.6 V6 Hybrid ready to go

In Sochi Bernie Ecclestone claimed he had solved the problems and both RedBull and Toro Rosso have an engine to compete with. Strangely enough no one could or wanted to confirm any of this. Various experts, such as Martin Brundle, expressed that Renault would probably be the only way to go for RedBull. In other words: last chance, save your marriage.

In the following days Bernie Ecclestone (again) started using the word ‘Cosworth’. According to various sources Bernie had come up with the idea to bring back the old V8, combined with more/larger KERS and some weight advantage in order to create a cheap alternative for the less wealthy teams. Would this be an easy and acceptable solution? Probably not since (for example) there are strict limitations on fuel weight but big differences in fuel consumption and so on. Probably this wasn’t even a serious idea.

Putting things in perspective while adding some history to most recent events leads to some interesting insights.

In the end of September ’14 several media – such as motorsport.com – reported that Cosworth has a V6 1.6 Hybrid on the shelf and wants to enter F1 as a good but reasonably priced alternative for all current F1 engine manufacturers. Driving force behind this concept: Bernie Ecclestone.

Owning the ship but not ruling it

This means the sly FOM-boss is walking around with the idea of having an independent engine supplier for a long time already. At the same time this shows how easy it is for RedBull to (at least) get an engine. But there’s one very important condition: new suppliers must be able to update their engines during the 2016 season in order to stand a chance against current ruling forces. The FIA and F1’s engine manufacturers agreed on that yesterday (Thursday), so this is no longer an obstacle. It has become a realistic option.

This is, however, the point where the other definition of ‘power’ comes in.

The F1 circus has gotten into a situation where both Mercedes and Ferrari rule in way too many subjects and layers. They dictate pecking order, participate in other teams, often decide who’s to drive in smaller team’s cars and last but not least decide whether RedBull (four times world champion!) and Toro Rosso are in or out. Almost. We can’t ignore the fact that Bernie Ecclestone officially (at least commercially) rules F1. However, he’s gotten into the situation of owning the ship but not ruling it.

Ready for eternal life

Ecclestone wouldn’t be Ecclestone if he wouldn’t come up with some kind of master plan that nobody foresees. His involvement in the Cosworth-project is probably a great example of his genius: by bringing Cosworth back into the sport as an independent engine supplier he doesn’t only make sure there’s an alternative for smaller and/or independent teams. He also makes sure his power (again) rises out above all others in order to lead and shape the sport the way he wants. Although we have to be careful and do realise this article contains a few assumptions it’s likely that Cosworth is indeed an option for RedBull Racing. Not with a V8, which Bernie suggested first, but with a V6 Hybrid. If RedBull stays in F1 thanks to Cosworth entering the sport that would be a win win situation. Especially for Mr. Bernard Ecclestone.

Now only one question remains unanswered: does Ecclestone have alternatives if this all goes wrong?

The simple answer to this question is a firm ‘yes’. In 2011 Ecclestone managed to get his hands on Formula One’s commercial rights for a period of 100 years. Yes, that’s what you read: one hundred years. Although F1 is a FIA championship, the European Commission decided that it’s not allowed to be both governing body and commercial rights holder. That’s why the FIA had to resign from commercial rights for a long period of time. This gives Bernie more power than the paperwork says he has.

If the FIA takes too many decisions against Ecclestone’s will he could enforce a situation in which Formula One is no longer profitable for it’s competitors, start his own championship and lure current F1 teams with tempting financial conditions. This option is real.

Only time will tell if this scenario will ever unfold. It’s a question only one man can answer. This article – most of all – makes clear who’s in charge of modern F1. If we didn’t already know. It seems very logical that Ecclestone wants to rule his own company and in order to achieve that - plus decreasing Ferrari’s and Mercedes’s power – bringing back Cosworth probably is the best and fastest way to achieve that. But there’s no doubt that ‘engine gate’ is not just about engines.

Replies (0)

Login to reply

BE Grand Prix of Belgium

Local time 

BEGrand Prix of Belgium

Local time 

World Championship standings 2024

Show full world champion standings

Test calendar

See full test schedule

Related news

Give your opinion!

Will Bottas challenge Hamilton for the world championship in 2020?

Formula 1 Calendar - 2024

Date
Grand Prix
Circuit
-
Bahrain
29 - Mar 2
Bahrain
7 - Mar 9
Saudi Arabia
22 - Mar 24
Australia
5 - Apr 7
Japan
19 - Apr 21
China
3 - May 5
United States of America
17 - May 19
Italy
24 - May 26
Monaco
7 - Jun 9
Canada
21 - Jun 23
Spain
28 - Jun 30
Austria
5 - Jul 7
United Kingdom
19 - Jul 21
Hungary
26 - Jul 28
Belgium
23 - Aug 25
Netherlands
30 - Sep 1
Italy
13 - Sep 15
Azerbaijan
20 - Sep 22
Singapore
18 - Oct 20
United States of America
25 - Oct 27
Mexico
1 - Nov 3
Brazil
22 - Nov 24
United States of America
29 - Dec 1
Qatar
6 - Dec 8
United Arab Emirates
See full schedule

Formula 1 Calendar - 2024

Date
Grand Prix & Circuit
29 - Mar 2
7 - Mar 9
Saudi Arabia Jeddah Street Circuit
22 - Mar 24
Australia Albert Park
5 - Apr 7
19 - Apr 21
3 - May 5
United States of America Miami International Autodrome
17 - May 19
24 - May 26
Monaco Monte Carlo
7 - Jun 9
21 - Jun 23
28 - Jun 30
Austria Red Bull Ring
5 - Jul 7
United Kingdom Silverstone
19 - Jul 21
Hungary Hungaroring
26 - Jul 28
23 - Aug 25
Netherlands Circuit Zandvoort
30 - Sep 1
Italy Monza
13 - Sep 15
Azerbaijan Baku City Circuit
20 - Sep 22
18 - Oct 20
United States of America Circuit of the Americas
25 - Oct 27
1 - Nov 3
Brazil Interlagos
22 - Nov 24
United States of America Las Vegas Street Circuit
29 - Dec 1
6 - Dec 8
United Arab Emirates Yas Marina Circuit
See full schedule

Team profile

Show full profile
show sidebar