user icon

Two engine concepts would've been madness - Lauda

  • Published on 25 Nov 2015 15:03
  • comments 2
  • By: Rob Veenstra

F1 legend Niki Lauda played a key role as a compromise was reached between the engine manufacturers and the governing FIA. That was the claim on Wednesday of Auto Motor und Sport, as the FIA confirmed reports that the 'client engine' proposal was voted down during Tuesday's Paris meeting of the F1 Commission.

"The parties involved have agreed on a course to address several key areas relating to power unit supply in formula one," a statement read. With FIA president Jean Todt most concerned about costs, another issue is guaranteeing supply for teams like Red Bull while Bernie Ecclestone wants simpler technology and more noise.

The FIA said the carmakers Mercedes, Ferrari, Renault and Honda will present their proposal on 15 January next year, for introduction in 2017 or 2018. But if the proposal is not satisfactory, the FIA warned on Wednesday that the idea of the 'parallel' engine rules - with Ilmor, Mecachrome, AER and another independent supplier all interested - "may be reassessed".

Germany's Auto Motor und Sport on Wednesday claimed Lauda, the Mercedes team chairman, had been instrumental to the compromise deal. "It's a good solution for the sport," he said, "and the right direction. "A championship with two different engine concepts would have been madness and destroyed formula one," Lauda added.

He revealed that the engine manufacturers will begin to discuss the proposal this weekend in Abu Dhabi. (GMM)

Replies (2)

Login to reply
  • ianf1

    Posts: 185

    So, from 2017:
    Get rid of KERS - Honda's deficiency will go away, and the costs will go down. Let the engines rev higher and allow more fuel per race to make up for the KERS loss, and also to increase the noise.

    It strikes me it is the Kers that the manufacturers struggle with the most to get right. It was introduced to make F1 appear more green and politically correct, but was noticeably absent in the proposed customer engine spec. Basically a PR exercise that horribly backfired (no pun intended).

    • + 0
    • Nov 25 2015 - 17:28
    • f1dave

      Posts: 782

      I agree , they could drastically reduce the use of telemetry as well.

      • + 0
      • Nov 27 2015 - 04:05

BE Grand Prix of Belgium

Local time 

BE Grand Prix of Belgium

Local time 

Related news

World Championship standings 2022

Show full world champion standings

Test calendar

See full test schedule

Give your opinion!

Will Bottas challenge Hamilton for the world championship in 2020?

Team profile

Show full profile

Formula 1 Calendar - 2022

Date
Grand Prix
Circuit
-
Spain
-
Bahrain
18 - Mar 20
Bahrain
25 - Mar 27
Saudi Arabia
8 - Apr 10
Australia
22 - Apr 24
Italy
6 - May 8
United States of America
20 - May 22
Spain
27 - May 29
Monaco
10 - Jun 12
Azerbaijan
17 - Jun 19
Canada
1 - Jul 3
United Kingdom
8 - Jul 10
Austria
22 - Jul 24
France
29 - Jul 31
Hungary
See full schedule

Formula 1 Calendar - 2022

Date
Grand Prix & Circuit
18 - Mar 20
25 - Mar 27
Saudi Arabia Jeddah Street Circuit
8 - Apr 10
Australia Albert Park
22 - Apr 24
6 - May 8
United States of America Miami International Autodrome
20 - May 22
27 - May 29
Monaco Monte Carlo
10 - Jun 12
Azerbaijan Baku City Circuit
17 - Jun 19
1 - Jul 3
United Kingdom Silverstone
8 - Jul 10
Austria Red Bull Ring
22 - Jul 24
France Paul Ricard
29 - Jul 31
Hungary Hungaroring
See full schedule
show sidebar